• The Story
  • The Blog
  • Contact Me

jimraffel.com


  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Story Teller | CEO | Traveler

You are here: Home / density / #23: TVI is a better term than Dot Gain

#23: TVI is a better term than Dot Gain

February 7, 2006 By Jim Raffel

This is Part 1 of a 5 part series from Jim Raffel’s TVI notebook.

Part 1: Tone Value Increase (TVI) really is a better term than Dot Gain: My short answer for this is that a densitometer (or spectrophotometer acting as a densitometer) does not actually measure dots, so how can we really call it Dot Gain? Add to this the fact that some systems being used for proofing result in continuous tone images with no dots and my position becomes a bit clearer. Those on the SWOP committee that spearheaded the initiative to change this misleading term (which I resisted early one) should be commended. After all, when a 50% patch of a color increases to an apparent 65% patch of that color the tone value has in fact increased regardless of whether that patch is made up of dots or not.

Coming next…Part 2: GRACoL 7 & TVI

Tweet
PinIt

Filed Under: density, GRACoL, TVI (Dot Gain) Tagged With: densitometer, dot gain, Printing, tvi

Trackbacks

  1. Why TVI is a better term than Dot Gain — ColorMetrix says:
    February 7, 2012 at 4:39 am

    […] This was re-purposed from CEO Jim Raffel’s original on Feb. 7, 2006. You can read that post here. […]

Get 30 years of business experience delivered to your inbox

Email Newsletter Signup

Each blog post will be delivered directly to your inbox, as well as unique content only for newsletter subscribers.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

About Me

Story Teller | CEO | Traveler
Click here to learn more

Search My Site

Copyright © 2025 James J. Raffel · jimraffel.com runs on the Genesis Framework