Home >

inkjet printer

#48: Make Proofs That Match Your Press

by JimRaffel on February 16, 2007

Since #45 in December we have been discussing resolutions to improve the quality of your proofs. In order to gain the full benefit of this installment one should have read and implemented the suggestions in #46 & #47.

Proceeding forward it does not matter if you are utilizing a methodology like GRACoL G7, or a more traditional color management approach. In either case you will include a target on each print job with the same color bar swatches that you output on the proof (#46). This will allow you to measure the press ok sheets and compare them to the proofs, thus building even a larger statistical database to call upon.

When utilizing software like our ColorMetrix and ProofPass.com products for process control and print certification purposes it does not matter if you are using a methodology like G7 or traditional color management. While there are some new formulas out there to run the collected data through the tried and true colorimetric data (L*a*b* and derivatives along with some version of Delta E), do a great job comparing two similar or dissimilar imaging systems.

Unlike density and dot gain values which must be used with pigment sets designed for 4/color process printing, L*a*b* values allow the comparison of an inkjet proof and an offset press sheet. This is possible because we are looking at the actual colors, not values derived from a formula which assumes a certain pigment set.

Not only will you be comparing the measurements of the proof to the press sheet, but you will be building a history of what is a “normal” print condition of each press and paper combination. Some refer to this as finding the “sweet spot” of the printing press.

Overall, as your volume of collected data grows you will be able to refine the system in small steps by reviewing the proofing and press information both independently and together. Using numeric results, charts, and graphs you will be able to see small differences in color that can be adjusted for over time. No system is stable over time, so continuous monitoring is a must in order to maintain stable color.

{

Continue Reading 1 comment }color, color bars, delta E, GRACoL, L*a*b*, L*C*h*, measurement, process capability, proofing, TVI (Dot Gain)

– FREE pass to Monday Night Expo and Paper Show at Print Oasis: ColorMetrix will be exhibiting at Print Oasis (April 2-5Las Vegas) a www.printbuyersonline.com show. The ticket at the link below will get you into the Monday night Expo for FREE.

http://www.colormetrix.com/docs/Paper_Show_Ticket.pdf

*** Golden Nugget #28: The difference between satin-gloss & high-gloss ***

…Everyone has an idea of what the terms “glossy” and “matte” mean. In case of terms like “satin-gloss”, “high-gloss” or “satin-matte”, however, which are often used in the printing industry, different observers may reach different conclusions… (Source: http://www.qipglossmeters.com/glossmeters )

For many years ColorMetrix has quietly developed keyboard wedge software for a line of gloss meters manufactured by Quality Imaging Products. As a result I have had the opportunity to test and work with the Gloss Meters and have also developed a pretty good understanding of why one would want to measure gloss in the printing industry (even though very few of us do).

In the last few weeks I have been assisting clients in understanding why their inkjet proofs do not match press sheets even though they have gone through the entire color management process. The problem in more than one case has been the inkjet paper selection. For sake of argument, we are printing on a semi matte sheet and proofing on a semi-matte inkjet proofing paper. Even if both the inkjet proofing device and the press have been profiled, these two papers are not the same and probably do not have exactly the same gloss. While a paper simulation is nice, it does not adjust for the difference in paper coating which is best quantified by gloss measurement.

Gloss has a great deal to do with how our eye and measuring instruments see images printed on paper. If for some reason you do not believe this, compare an identical advertisement printed in a newspaper versus weekly news magazine.

If anyone would like this quantified, please feel free to send me samples of your proofing paper and the papers you are using this sample to represent. I would be happy to measure the gloss of both and get the results to you.

Coming next…Inkjet proofing on the exact paper you print on.

{

Continue Reading 0 comments }gloss, inkjet, paper, proofing

#27: Measuring TVI on Inkjet proofs is Meaningless

March 9, 2006

Part 5: I should start by saying I have covered the topic of using graphic arts densitometry to evaluate inkjet proofs once before. Back in July ’05 GN#5 addressed this same issue so you may wish to refer back to it. I considered changing this topic, because the title is a bit inflammatory. Understand that [...]

#26: Density is king

February 28, 2006

Part 4: TVI is not measured it is calculated from density which is king. All the other values our modern densitometers display are simply calculated values from the densities the instrument measures. In short, all a densitometer does is transmit a predetermined amount of light and then measure how much comes back to the instrument. [...]

Golden Nugget #5 Density & TVI or L*a*b?

July 13, 2005

This post now appears as Color Conversations: Density & TVI or L*a*b? on Color Conversations the blog of ColorMetrix Technologies, LLC. *** Introduction *** Next, I want to let you all know that since the inception of the golden nuggets idea both of the Mikes at ColorMetrix (Michael Litscher-CTO & Co-founder; Michael Woods-Technical Services Manager) [...]