Home >

ink

#48: Make Proofs That Match Your Press

by JimRaffel on February 16, 2007

Since #45 in December we have been discussing resolutions to improve the quality of your proofs. In order to gain the full benefit of this installment one should have read and implemented the suggestions in #46 & #47.

Proceeding forward it does not matter if you are utilizing a methodology like GRACoL G7, or a more traditional color management approach. In either case you will include a target on each print job with the same color bar swatches that you output on the proof (#46). This will allow you to measure the press ok sheets and compare them to the proofs, thus building even a larger statistical database to call upon.

When utilizing software like our ColorMetrix and ProofPass.com products for process control and print certification purposes it does not matter if you are using a methodology like G7 or traditional color management. While there are some new formulas out there to run the collected data through the tried and true colorimetric data (L*a*b* and derivatives along with some version of Delta E), do a great job comparing two similar or dissimilar imaging systems.

Unlike density and dot gain values which must be used with pigment sets designed for 4/color process printing, L*a*b* values allow the comparison of an inkjet proof and an offset press sheet. This is possible because we are looking at the actual colors, not values derived from a formula which assumes a certain pigment set.

Not only will you be comparing the measurements of the proof to the press sheet, but you will be building a history of what is a “normal” print condition of each press and paper combination. Some refer to this as finding the “sweet spot” of the printing press.

Overall, as your volume of collected data grows you will be able to refine the system in small steps by reviewing the proofing and press information both independently and together. Using numeric results, charts, and graphs you will be able to see small differences in color that can be adjusted for over time. No system is stable over time, so continuous monitoring is a must in order to maintain stable color.

{

Continue Reading 1 comment }color, color bars, delta E, GRACoL, L*a*b*, L*C*h*, measurement, process capability, proofing, TVI (Dot Gain)

#26: Density is king

by JimRaffel on February 28, 2006

Part 4: TVI is not measured it is calculated from density which is king. All the other values our modern densitometers display are simply calculated values from the densities the instrument measures. In short, all a densitometer does is transmit a predetermined amount of light and then measure how much comes back to the instrument. This is done through Red, Green and Blue filters so the instrument can tell if the light was stopped by Cyan, Magenta, or Yellow ink.

One reader made a comment at JimRaffel.com that density is also a good indicator of ink film thickness on a printing press. Just remember that two inks with different pigment loads can record the same density and have different ink film thickness.

Coming next…Part 5 Measuring TVI of Inkjet proofs in meaningless

{

Continue Reading 0 comments }density, TVI (Dot Gain)

#16 Matamerism & Color Management

October 26, 2005

This post has be revised and reposted at ColorMetrix[dot]com as Color Conversations: Metamerism & Color Management. There was a good comment in response to “Golden Nugget #15 Which Instrument Should I Use?” Adam made the following comment: “This is because some spectrophotometers are built with spectral response every 20 nanometers while others respond every 10 [...]

Golden Nugget #5 Density & TVI or L*a*b?

July 13, 2005

This post now appears as Color Conversations: Density & TVI or L*a*b? on Color Conversations the blog of ColorMetrix Technologies, LLC. *** Introduction *** Next, I want to let you all know that since the inception of the golden nuggets idea both of the Mikes at ColorMetrix (Michael Litscher-CTO & Co-founder; Michael Woods-Technical Services Manager) [...]