<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual Proofing - Oh Boy!</title>
	<link>http://jimraffel.com/2008/04/17/virtual-proofing-oh-boy/</link>
	<description>A printing industry blog focusing on color measurement, printing, ink, paper, spectrophotometers, and densitometers.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://jimraffel.com/2008/04/17/virtual-proofing-oh-boy/#comment-5932</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jimraffel.com/2008/04/17/virtual-proofing-oh-boy/#comment-5932</guid>
		<description>I think we are all on the right road with virtual proofing, many good reasons as to why it makes sense. Just like anything else there will be some bumps along the way, you just wish there were a few road signs....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we are all on the right road with virtual proofing, many good reasons as to why it makes sense. Just like anything else there will be some bumps along the way, you just wish there were a few road signs&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
