<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I still love the smell of ink in the morning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/19/i-still-love-the-smell-of-ink-in-the-morning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/19/i-still-love-the-smell-of-ink-in-the-morning/</link>
	<description>Business owner, blogger, speaker, and gadget lover</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Pariser</title>
		<link>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/19/i-still-love-the-smell-of-ink-in-the-morning/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Pariser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/19/i-still-love-the-smell-of-ink-in-the-morning/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Jim,

Thanks for publishing your results and bringing this new technology to my attention. As you know, I&#039;m currently interested in minimizing the density and dot gain variation in sequetntial pulls for a project. Could you post the data you collected from this test, as well as any analysis you&#039;ve done to show how much the short-term density and dot-gain variation was diminished with the new blanket?

Thanks,
Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>Thanks for publishing your results and bringing this new technology to my attention. As you know, I&#8217;m currently interested in minimizing the density and dot gain variation in sequetntial pulls for a project. Could you post the data you collected from this test, as well as any analysis you&#8217;ve done to show how much the short-term density and dot-gain variation was diminished with the new blanket?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Pariser</title>
		<link>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/19/i-still-love-the-smell-of-ink-in-the-morning/comment-page-1/#comment-6370</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Pariser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/19/i-still-love-the-smell-of-ink-in-the-morning/#comment-6370</guid>
		<description>Jim,

Thanks for publishing your results and bringing this new technology to my attention. As you know, I&#039;m currently interested in minimizing the density and dot gain variation in sequetntial pulls for a project. Could you post the data you collected from this test, as well as any analysis you&#039;ve done to show how much the short-term density and dot-gain variation was diminished with the new blanket?

Thanks,
Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>Thanks for publishing your results and bringing this new technology to my attention. As you know, I&#8217;m currently interested in minimizing the density and dot gain variation in sequetntial pulls for a project. Could you post the data you collected from this test, as well as any analysis you&#8217;ve done to show how much the short-term density and dot-gain variation was diminished with the new blanket?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

