<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I still love the smell of ink in the morning</title>
	<link>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/19/i-still-love-the-smell-of-ink-in-the-morning/</link>
	<description>A printing industry blog focusing on color measurement, printing, ink, paper, spectrophotometers, and densitometers.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Pariser</title>
		<link>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/19/i-still-love-the-smell-of-ink-in-the-morning/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Pariser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/19/i-still-love-the-smell-of-ink-in-the-morning/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Jim,

Thanks for publishing your results and bringing this new technology to my attention. As you know, I'm currently interested in minimizing the density and dot gain variation in sequetntial pulls for a project. Could you post the data you collected from this test, as well as any analysis you've done to show how much the short-term density and dot-gain variation was diminished with the new blanket? 

Thanks,
Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>Thanks for publishing your results and bringing this new technology to my attention. As you know, I&#8217;m currently interested in minimizing the density and dot gain variation in sequetntial pulls for a project. Could you post the data you collected from this test, as well as any analysis you&#8217;ve done to show how much the short-term density and dot-gain variation was diminished with the new blanket? </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
