<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Standards, Dues, and Barriers to Entry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/</link>
	<description>Business owner, blogger, speaker, and gadget lover</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Raffel</title>
		<link>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Raffel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Dale-Thank you for the well thought out response to my original post and the comments of others.  In my original post I should have pointed out that at least one group operates in the graphic arts area with a ‚Äúno dues‚Äù structure and that is BRIDGS.  I also had not intention to single out any specific group, and have actually ‚Äúdefended‚Äù GRACoL in previous comment responses.
-Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dale-Thank you for the well thought out response to my original post and the comments of others.  In my original post I should have pointed out that at least one group operates in the graphic arts area with a ‚Äúno dues‚Äù structure and that is BRIDGS.  I also had not intention to single out any specific group, and have actually ‚Äúdefended‚Äù GRACoL in previous comment responses.<br />
-Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Raffel</title>
		<link>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/comment-page-1/#comment-6369</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Raffel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/#comment-6369</guid>
		<description>Dale-Thank you for the well thought out response to my original post and the comments of others.  In my original post I should have pointed out that at least one group operates in the graphic arts area with a ‚Äúno dues‚Äù structure and that is BRIDGS.  I also had not intention to single out any specific group, and have actually ‚Äúdefended‚Äù GRACoL in previous comment responses.
-Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dale-Thank you for the well thought out response to my original post and the comments of others.  In my original post I should have pointed out that at least one group operates in the graphic arts area with a ‚Äúno dues‚Äù structure and that is BRIDGS.  I also had not intention to single out any specific group, and have actually ‚Äúdefended‚Äù GRACoL in previous comment responses.<br />
-Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>In regards to the barriers to entry.

I have not seen any restrictions on the downloading or using of the GRACoL data or specification.

So the &quot;We need open print standards that can be implemented by anyone, without royalties or other restrictions&quot; doesn&#039;t hold water. i mean, it makes sense and I agree, but it doesn&#039;t apply in this case.

If you want to get involved with the standard and actually work in the working groups, go to the meetings, make your equipment available for testing, VOTE and control the spec. etc THEN it makes sense to join. (that kind of committment is also going to cost a lot more than the membership fees)

It also make sense to restrict the people who belong to the actual contributor / controller group so there aren&#039;t a bunch of tire-kickers who simply slow the process down. $2500 is a fair amount of money but not too unreasonable for those who actually are players and want to help shape the industry.

From their website &quot;IDEAlliance is a not-for-profit membership organization&quot;

In response to &quot;I think a lot of these old-style industry organizations are going to get clobbered to death as they lose their stranglehold on information.&quot; - I think it is important to realize that the IDEALliance does not have a stangle-hold on the information and, in fact, their value to the industry is the shepherding of standards. They need dues to operate and so charging fees required to operate seems fair to me. This is a printing specification for businesses to operate and control. We are not talking about the average consumer here. Also IDEALliance is not only responsible for GRACoL they also have SWOP and a number of other things under their umbrella so buying a member ship gives you access to a number of different works-in-progress.

This in NO WAY means that the results of the work are not available, FREE for anyone who wants to download and implement them. The G7 training guide is up there, free, the press run data is up there, free.

Dale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the barriers to entry.</p>
<p>I have not seen any restrictions on the downloading or using of the GRACoL data or specification.</p>
<p>So the &#8220;We need open print standards that can be implemented by anyone, without royalties or other restrictions&#8221; doesn&#8217;t hold water. i mean, it makes sense and I agree, but it doesn&#8217;t apply in this case.</p>
<p>If you want to get involved with the standard and actually work in the working groups, go to the meetings, make your equipment available for testing, VOTE and control the spec. etc THEN it makes sense to join. (that kind of committment is also going to cost a lot more than the membership fees)</p>
<p>It also make sense to restrict the people who belong to the actual contributor / controller group so there aren&#8217;t a bunch of tire-kickers who simply slow the process down. $2500 is a fair amount of money but not too unreasonable for those who actually are players and want to help shape the industry.</p>
<p>From their website &#8220;IDEAlliance is a not-for-profit membership organization&#8221;</p>
<p>In response to &#8220;I think a lot of these old-style industry organizations are going to get clobbered to death as they lose their stranglehold on information.&#8221; &#8211; I think it is important to realize that the IDEALliance does not have a stangle-hold on the information and, in fact, their value to the industry is the shepherding of standards. They need dues to operate and so charging fees required to operate seems fair to me. This is a printing specification for businesses to operate and control. We are not talking about the average consumer here. Also IDEALliance is not only responsible for GRACoL they also have SWOP and a number of other things under their umbrella so buying a member ship gives you access to a number of different works-in-progress.</p>
<p>This in NO WAY means that the results of the work are not available, FREE for anyone who wants to download and implement them. The G7 training guide is up there, free, the press run data is up there, free.</p>
<p>Dale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/comment-page-1/#comment-6368</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/#comment-6368</guid>
		<description>In regards to the barriers to entry.

I have not seen any restrictions on the downloading or using of the GRACoL data or specification.

So the &quot;We need open print standards that can be implemented by anyone, without royalties or other restrictions&quot; doesn&#039;t hold water. i mean, it makes sense and I agree, but it doesn&#039;t apply in this case.

If you want to get involved with the standard and actually work in the working groups, go to the meetings, make your equipment available for testing, VOTE and control the spec. etc THEN it makes sense to join. (that kind of committment is also going to cost a lot more than the membership fees)

It also make sense to restrict the people who belong to the actual contributor / controller group so there aren&#039;t a bunch of tire-kickers who simply slow the process down. $2500 is a fair amount of money but not too unreasonable for those who actually are players and want to help shape the industry.

From their website &quot;IDEAlliance is a not-for-profit membership organization&quot;

In response to &quot;I think a lot of these old-style industry organizations are going to get clobbered to death as they lose their stranglehold on information.&quot; - I think it is important to realize that the IDEALliance does not have a stangle-hold on the information and, in fact, their value to the industry is the shepherding of standards. They need dues to operate and so charging fees required to operate seems fair to me. This is a printing specification for businesses to operate and control. We are not talking about the average consumer here. Also IDEALliance is not only responsible for GRACoL they also have SWOP and a number of other things under their umbrella so buying a member ship gives you access to a number of different works-in-progress.

This in NO WAY means that the results of the work are not available, FREE for anyone who wants to download and implement them. The G7 training guide is up there, free, the press run data is up there, free.

Dale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the barriers to entry.</p>
<p>I have not seen any restrictions on the downloading or using of the GRACoL data or specification.</p>
<p>So the &#8220;We need open print standards that can be implemented by anyone, without royalties or other restrictions&#8221; doesn&#8217;t hold water. i mean, it makes sense and I agree, but it doesn&#8217;t apply in this case.</p>
<p>If you want to get involved with the standard and actually work in the working groups, go to the meetings, make your equipment available for testing, VOTE and control the spec. etc THEN it makes sense to join. (that kind of committment is also going to cost a lot more than the membership fees)</p>
<p>It also make sense to restrict the people who belong to the actual contributor / controller group so there aren&#8217;t a bunch of tire-kickers who simply slow the process down. $2500 is a fair amount of money but not too unreasonable for those who actually are players and want to help shape the industry.</p>
<p>From their website &#8220;IDEAlliance is a not-for-profit membership organization&#8221;</p>
<p>In response to &#8220;I think a lot of these old-style industry organizations are going to get clobbered to death as they lose their stranglehold on information.&#8221; &#8211; I think it is important to realize that the IDEALliance does not have a stangle-hold on the information and, in fact, their value to the industry is the shepherding of standards. They need dues to operate and so charging fees required to operate seems fair to me. This is a printing specification for businesses to operate and control. We are not talking about the average consumer here. Also IDEALliance is not only responsible for GRACoL they also have SWOP and a number of other things under their umbrella so buying a member ship gives you access to a number of different works-in-progress.</p>
<p>This in NO WAY means that the results of the work are not available, FREE for anyone who wants to download and implement them. The G7 training guide is up there, free, the press run data is up there, free.</p>
<p>Dale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 01:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I should also point out that I&#039;m the proud owner of a .ORG domain -- ColorInfo.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also point out that I&#8217;m the proud owner of a .ORG domain &#8212; ColorInfo.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/comment-page-1/#comment-6367</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 01:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/#comment-6367</guid>
		<description>I should also point out that I&#039;m the proud owner of a .ORG domain -- ColorInfo.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also point out that I&#8217;m the proud owner of a .ORG domain &#8212; ColorInfo.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 01:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>There are no restrictions on the .ORG TLD.  Anyone or any company can register a .ORG domain name.

See VIII. Differentiation of the .org TLD at http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/applications/organic/viii.html

If you read the IDEAlliance Bylaws you will see that the association is a Virginia Nonstock Corporation.

&lt;em&gt;The Association is organized and shall be operated for such purposes permitted by the Articles of Incorporation and the Virginia Nonstock Corporation Act which are consistent with section 501(c) (6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the ‚ÄúCode‚Äù).&lt;/em&gt;

IDEALLiance Bylaws: http://www.idealliance.org/about/bylaws&amp;policies.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no restrictions on the .ORG TLD.  Anyone or any company can register a .ORG domain name.</p>
<p>See VIII. Differentiation of the .org TLD at <a href="http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/applications/organic/viii.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/applications/organic/viii.html</a></p>
<p>If you read the IDEAlliance Bylaws you will see that the association is a Virginia Nonstock Corporation.</p>
<p><em>The Association is organized and shall be operated for such purposes permitted by the Articles of Incorporation and the Virginia Nonstock Corporation Act which are consistent with section 501(c) (6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the ‚ÄúCode‚Äù).</em></p>
<p>IDEALLiance Bylaws: <a href="http://www.idealliance.org/about/bylaws&#038;policies.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.idealliance.org/about/bylaws&#038;policies.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/comment-page-1/#comment-6366</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/#comment-6366</guid>
		<description>There are no restrictions on the .ORG TLD.  Anyone or any company can register a .ORG domain name.

See VIII. Differentiation of the .org TLD at http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/applications/organic/viii.html

If you read the IDEAlliance Bylaws you will see that the association is a Virginia Nonstock Corporation.

&lt;em&gt;The Association is organized and shall be operated for such purposes permitted by the Articles of Incorporation and the Virginia Nonstock Corporation Act which are consistent with section 501(c) (6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the ‚ÄúCode‚Äù).&lt;/em&gt;

IDEALLiance Bylaws: http://www.idealliance.org/about/bylaws&amp;policies.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no restrictions on the .ORG TLD.  Anyone or any company can register a .ORG domain name.</p>
<p>See VIII. Differentiation of the .org TLD at <a href="http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/applications/organic/viii.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/applications/organic/viii.html</a></p>
<p>If you read the IDEAlliance Bylaws you will see that the association is a Virginia Nonstock Corporation.</p>
<p><em>The Association is organized and shall be operated for such purposes permitted by the Articles of Incorporation and the Virginia Nonstock Corporation Act which are consistent with section 501(c) (6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the ‚ÄúCode‚Äù).</em></p>
<p>IDEALLiance Bylaws: <a href="http://www.idealliance.org/about/bylaws&#038;policies.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.idealliance.org/about/bylaws&#038;policies.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Steve-Perhaps someone else knows the answer but I am almost positive that to be a .ORG as Idealliance is one has to prove non-profit status.  Again I have been wrong many times in my life as my wife will confirm, but this I am pretty sure of. - Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve-Perhaps someone else knows the answer but I am almost positive that to be a .ORG as Idealliance is one has to prove non-profit status.  Again I have been wrong many times in my life as my wife will confirm, but this I am pretty sure of. &#8211; Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/comment-page-1/#comment-6365</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimraffel.com/2006/04/12/on-standards-dues-and-barriers-to-entry/#comment-6365</guid>
		<description>Steve-Perhaps someone else knows the answer but I am almost positive that to be a .ORG as Idealliance is one has to prove non-profit status.  Again I have been wrong many times in my life as my wife will confirm, but this I am pretty sure of. - Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve-Perhaps someone else knows the answer but I am almost positive that to be a .ORG as Idealliance is one has to prove non-profit status.  Again I have been wrong many times in my life as my wife will confirm, but this I am pretty sure of. &#8211; Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

