Home > density, GRACoL, TVI (Dot Gain) > #23: TVI is a better term than Dot Gain

#23: TVI is a better term than Dot Gain

by JimRaffel on February 7, 2006

This is Part 1 of a 5 part series from Jim Raffel’s TVI notebook.

Part 1: Tone Value Increase (TVI) really is a better term than Dot Gain: My short answer for this is that a densitometer (or spectrophotometer acting as a densitometer) does not actually measure dots, so how can we really call it Dot Gain? Add to this the fact that some systems being used for proofing result in continuous tone images with no dots and my position becomes a bit clearer. Those on the SWOP committee that spearheaded the initiative to change this misleading term (which I resisted early one) should be commended. After all, when a 50% patch of a color increases to an apparent 65% patch of that color the tone value has in fact increased regardless of whether that patch is made up of dots or not.

Coming next…Part 2: GRACoL 7 & TVI

Never miss another post!

Thesis Theme thumbnail

Three times a week I publish new content about the strategies I utilize to grow business online with social media engagement via story telling. Make sure to never miss another article by signing up for daily updates delivered to either your inbox or RSS feed.

This site runs on the Thesis Theme

Thesis has so many design options, you can use the template over and over and never have it look like the same site. Learn more about Thesis by visiting their Plans & Pricing page.

Previous post:

Next post: